Controversy May Sap Bush's Credibility

MAY sap his CREDIBILITY?
May!?!
Credibility!?!
"That liberal media" is just ripping him a new one, huh? He's already down to 36% job approval in even the wingnuttiest of polls, and still it's only a POSSIBILITY that he MIGHT be losing some credibility. I hope we keep that sort of "benefit of a doubt" for the next Democratic President, but I ain't gonna hold my breath. Somehow, I'm pretty sure the press will miraculously get it's collective balls back when the Democrats regain power. IOKIYAR.

Here's some headlines from at home and around the world. I think the next few years are gonna (almost) make up for having to live through the last 6 hellish years. Wait'll someone actually starts investigating this shit. Filegate and Memogate and all that other fake BS they threw at Clinton will seem fucking quaint. Hell, Nixon's crimes will seem quaint compared to this crew's. What am I saying, they already do.
Controversy May Sap Bush's Credibility
A Leaky President
The Leaker in Chief?
White House: Leak In `Public Interest'
White House Defense: That's No Leak
Spin Cycle Springs A Leak
Leaker-In-Chief?

Comments

[KEVIN SCHMIDT, STERLING VA]

WHAT THEY ARE NOT TELLING YOU ABOUT PLAMEGATE

Aside from the FACT that the Washington Post chose to repeat misinformation about Plamegate, they left out a few glaring details in their ridiculous approval of Valerie Plame's outing for political gain.

Leaking Valerie Plame's name took a valuable resource out of the REAL war on terror. This action approved by the President and Vice President has endangered the lives of every American citizen, both at home and abroad.

Leaking Plame's name also blew her front cover employer, Brewster Jennings & Associates. It was Robert Novak, American traitor, and political commentator hack, who in collusion with Bush and Cheney, first published the highly classified information.

It has been suggested that there were other resources within the CIA who were also working undercover as non-official cover operative" (NOC) as employees of Brewster Jennings. It has also been suggested that once their undercover status was compromised, they were quickly captured and eliminated, thus multiplying the damage done to the CIA's ability to gather valuable information in the Mid East.

The outing of Plame destroyed all trust the CIA had for the Bush/Cheney administration. Why would they now put their lives on the line as NOCs knowing that at any time, their cover could also be blown for political gain, thus ending their careers and possibly ending their lives as well?

But there's more!

Plame... 'was a long-term proprietary and deep-cover NOC - well established and consistently producing "take" from ARAMCO (and who knows what else in Saudi Arabia). It was destroyed with a motive of personal vengeance (there may have been other motives) by someone inside the White House.

From the CIA's point of view, at a time when Saudi Arabia is one of the three or four countries of highest interest to the US, the Plame operation was irreplaceable.

Almost the entire Bush administration has an interest in ARAMCO.

The Boston Globe reported that in 2001 ARAMCO had signed a $140 million multi-year contract with Halliburton, then chaired by Dick Cheney, to develop a new oil field. Halliburton does a lot of business in Saudi Arabia. Current estimates of Halliburton contracts or joint ventures in the country run into the tens of billions of dollars.

So do the fortunes of some shady figures from the Bush family's past.

As recently as 1991 ARAMCO had Khalid bin Mahfouz sitting on its Supreme Council or board of directors. Mahfouz, Saudi Arabia's former treasurer and the nation's largest banker, has been reported in several places to be Osama bin Laden's brother in law.

ARAMCO is the largest oil group in the world, a state-owned Saudi company in partnership with four major US oil companies.

Another one of Aramco’s partners is Chevron-Texaco which gave up one of its board members, Condoleezza Rice, when she became the National Security Advisor to George Bush.

All of ARAMCO’s key decisions are made by the Saudi royal family while US oil expertise, personnel and technology keeps the cash coming in and the oil going out. ARAMCO operates, manages, and maintains virtually all Saudi oil fields – 25% of all the oil on the planet.'

http://www.oilempire.us/plame.html

Also, let's not forget the long term friendship and business partnerships between the Bush family and the bin Laden family.

Knowing all of this, how can anyone in their right mind approve of Bush and Cheney's treasonous behavior of outing Valerie Plame and Brewster Jennings for political gain?

[Hemaworstje]

way to go , to bad the vast majority of the usa does not have the skills nor the eduction to understand it.
but keep bashing , I like that.

[arto]

First reaction on seeing that headline: "You mean Bush still has credibility to damage?"

[Sam]

36? Isn't that the number of guys Dante's girlfriend "did" in "Clerks"?

[Lew]

The Washington Post will not turn on Bush unless they get a photo of him sucking Jeff Gannon's dick.

Fox News will not turn on the Bush Administration if Cheney himself is filmed impaling a baby on a stick, barbecuing it, and taking a bite out of it while smiling before the cameras. Why? Because pundits will appear on Fox News stating that it's the baby's fault. It should not have enticed Vice President with its cuteness.